Maureen McNamara Christopher Taylor Mariah Lynn Taylor, Individually and on Behalf of the General Public v. F 48, a Limited Partnership United Pacific Land, a California Corporation, Bobbie Casey Jim Casey, Dba Le Chateau Apartments

Good Law
83 F.3d 427
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 24, 199694-17106California1,148 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 427 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Maureen MCNAMARA; Christopher Taylor; Mariah Lynn Taylor, individually and on behalf of the General Public, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. F 48, a limited partnership; United Pacific Land, a California corporation, Bobbie Casey; Jim Casey, dba Le Chateau Apartments, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17106. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 9, 1996. Decided April 24, 1996. As Amended May 24, 1996. Before: FERGUSON, D.W. NELSON, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Maureen McNamara, Christopher Taylor, and Mariah Lynn Taylor (collectively "the Taylors") appeal the district court's judgment and order denying their motion for a new trial following a jury verdict against them. The Taylors allege that the owners and managers of a housing complex discriminated against them on the basis of familial status in violation of the United States Fair Housing Act and the California Unruh…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.