Rodriguez v. City of Simi Valley

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Ralph RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SIMI VALLEY; Kathy Vigil; Unknown Hostetler, Detective; Unknown Daniels, Detective; Unknown Delamater, Detective; Steven Lerman, Officer; Unknown Hopkins, Detective, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55263. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ralph Rodriguez appeals the district court's summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Specifically, Rodriguez claims that defendants lacked probable cause to arrest him on charges of sexually abusing his daughter. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the district court's conclusion regarding defendants' entitlement to qualified immunity, Fry v. Melaragno, 939 F.2d 832, 835 (9th Cir.1991), and affirm. 3 Rodriguez contends that the district…