Alexander Olguini v. Samuel Lewis, Adoc Director Grant Woods, Attorney General

Good Law
83 F.3d 428·1996 WL 183538·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28618
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199695-16151California366 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alexander OLGUINI, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, ADOC Director; Grant Woods, Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-16151. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona prisoner Alexander Olguini appeals pro se the district court's denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Olguini contends that: (1) he was denied a full and fair opportunity in state court to litigate his Fourth Amendment claim; (2) his trial and appellate counsel were ineffective for failing to challenge properly evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment; and (3) his sentence was illegal and constituted cruel and unusual punishment. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 , 2253. We review de novo. Calderon v. Prunty, 59 F.3d 1005, 1008 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.