Sherman v. Byrd

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Janet SHERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Richard Sears; Sandra Sears, Plaintiffs, v. Cois BYRD; Steven C. Bailey; John Horton; Don Anderson; Sheriff Andrews, Riverside County Sheriff; Guy Kestell; Allen Paine; Dave Pike; Steve Kollar; Ken Riding; John Boyd; Dan Borden; Winston Pingrey; Armando Portales; Gil Hayes; Bill Walsh; Dave Madden; Guy Benoit; Stan Johnson; Mike Mott; Charles Varga; Thirty Unknown Named Riverside County Sheriff Department Officers, all sued in both their official and individual capacities; County of Riverside, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56307. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 5, 1996. Decided April 24, 1996. Before: SKOPIL, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Janet Sherman appeals the district court's directed verdicts in favor of twenty-eight of the twenty-nine defendants in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that officers of…