Joe Allen Robles v. Warden Crist and Officer Garcia

Good Law
83 F.3d 428·1996 WL 204832·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28605
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 199695-16821California337 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joe Allen ROBLES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden CRIST and officer Garcia, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16821. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joe Allen Robles, Arizona state prisoner appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of prison officials in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action regarding strip searches of work crews who return from outside the prison gates. 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We agree with the district court that prison officials did not violate Robles' Fourth Amendment or Eighth Amendment rights when they strip-searched him in a private room adjoining the prison gate upon his return from a work crew assignment. See Wilson v. Seiter, 111 S.Ct. 2334 , 2338 (1991); Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.