In re Schimmels

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re H. Edwin SCHIMMELS; Mary Jo Schimmels, Debtors. UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Stephen Rudd, Mark Lanterman, Deborah Gibson, Henry Winburn and Howard L. Hamby, Appellants, and UNITED STATES of America, Intervenor, v. H. Edwin SCHIMMELS; Mary Jo Schimmels, Appellees. No. 95-15143. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 11, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. ORDER 1 Due to the termination of the automatic stay in bankruptcy court, the issues presented in this case have become moot. See 11 U.S.C. § 362 (c)(1). This court, therefore, is without jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. United States Parole Comm'n v. Geraghty, 445 U.S. 388, 395-97 (1980). 2 In United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950), the Supreme Court observed that "[t]he established practice of the Court in dealing with a civil case…