Balzer

Balzer v. United States

Good Law
22 F. App'x 942
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 9, 2002No. 00-16564; D.C. No. CV-98-01606-SICalifornia293 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

While the IRS may have been negligent in failing to file a proof of claim in the *943 Balzer/Shopes, Inc. bankruptcy proceeding for the full amount to which it was entitled, negligence in proposing a claim in Chapter 11 does not amount to an exercise of dominion and control. 1 Other courts have credited taxpayers for IRS error in the contexts of a valid levy under 26 U.S.C. § 6631 (a) 2 and of a levy and notice of seizure under 26 U.S.C. § 6335 . 3 But even with a levy or seizure in place, the IRS does not necessarily exercise dominion and control merely because it disposes of assets in a manner different from that specified by the taxpayer. 4 Negligence by the IRS in claiming money in the control of a debtor in possession under Chapter 11 is not the same as dominion and control of the assets. Appellants thus retain their independent tax liability to “pay over” to the IRS the assessed penalty due for their corporation’s withheld employment taxes. 5 No genuine issue of material fact exists which would render the district court’s grant of summary judgment improper.

We AFFIRM.

This disposition is not appropriate for publica *943 tion and may not be cited to or by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.