Harold L. Richardson v. James Gomez K. Post D. Larson J. Cardenas F. Placeres C. Collins, Correctional Counselors I. John Fraye, Assignment Lieutenant

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Harold L. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ; K. Post; D. Larson; J. Cardenas; F. Placeres; C. Collins, Correctional Counselors; I. John Fraye, Assignment Lieutenant, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15461. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, RYMER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Harold L. Richardson, a former California state prisoner currently on parole, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant prison officials in Richardson's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for damages. Richardson alleged that, when defendants failed to declare him medically disabled in a timely manner, they unlawfully deprived him of an earlier release date made possible by worktime credits earned under Cal.Code Regs. tit. 15, § 3044(b)(1)(D) (1992). Because Richardson had unsuccessfully litigated an…