Brenda N. Sieren v. Federal Labor Relations Authority General Counsel

Good Law
83 F.3d 428·1996 WL 183499·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28620
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199695-15212California580 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Brenda N. SIEREN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY; General Counsel, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15212. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 Brenda N. Sieren, a former employee of the United States Department of Education, appeals pro se the district court's order granting the Federal Labor Relations Authority's ("FLRA") Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Sieren's unfair labor practice ("ULP") claim, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7116 , and granting the FLRA summary judgment as to Sieren's sex discrimination claim under Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 2 We review de novo the district court's Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal, Franceschi v. Schwartz, 57 F.3d 828, 830 (9th Cir.1995), and the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.