Curtis Alan Renner v. State of Oregon

83 F.3d 428 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Curtis Alan RENNER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-35527. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Oregon state prisoner Curtis Alan Renner appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition challenging his conviction for burglary. Renner contends his counsel was ineffective because she failed to file a suppression motion during his state court proceedings and because she failed to inform Renner that he could be subject to federal prosecution as a result of pleading guilty to the state law charge. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 . We review de novo, Calderon v. Prunty, 59 F.3d 1005, 1008 (9th Cir.1995), and affirm. 3 * Background 4 Renner pleaded guilty in state court to one count of first degree…