United States v. Louis Anthony Feliciano, A/K/A Frederico Ernesto Morador

Good Law
83 F.3d 429·1996 WL 204561·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28579
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 199695-10348California592 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 429 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis Anthony FELICIANO, a/k/a Frederico Ernesto Morador, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10348. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Louis Anthony Feliciano appeals his 27-month sentence imposed following entry of a guilty plea to bank fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344 . Feliciano contends that the district court erred by denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's determination to grant or deny the defendant an acceptance of responsibility reduction. United States v. Rutledge, 28 F.3d 998, 1000 (9th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 1161 (1995). "We accord great…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.