United States v. Alexander Hampton

83 F.3d 429 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander HAMPTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alexander Hampton appeals his sentence following the entry of a guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute, and distribution of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), and use of a weapon in narcotics trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c). Hampton's counsel submitted a brief stating that he found no meritorious issues for review, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel also filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Hampton filed a supplemental pro se brief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 1 3 Hampton waived his right to appeal or collaterally attack his…