United States v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr., United States of America v. H. Wayne Hayes, Jr.

83 F.3d 429 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H. Wayne HAYES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. H. Wayne HAYES, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10412, 93-10413. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 13, 1996. Decided April 26, 1996. Before: CHOY, BEEZER, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 H. Wayne Hayes, Jr. appeals his conviction of fourteen counts of mail fraud, one count of wire fraud, and two counts of interstate transportation of stolen money. Hayes claims that: (1) the district judge was biased, (2) the district judge imposed a vindictive sentence, (3) the prosecution violated its Brady obligation by not producing evidence held by the SEC and Hawaii Attorney General's Office, (4) the prosecution violated its Brady obligation by not producing evidence that four of its witnesses were paid commissions for selling Apollo…