United States v. Daniel Leyva, United States of America v. Manuel Enrique Sotelo-Gamez, United States of America v. Jose Luis Quijada-Castillo

83 F.3d 429 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel LEYVA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Manuel Enrique SOTELO-GAMEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis QUIJADA-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-10039, 95-10041 and 95-10043. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 12, 1996. * Decided April 16, 1996. Before: REINHARDT, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 By memorandum disposition we vacated the original sentences imposed by the district court on defendants Leyva, Sotelo-Gamez, and Quijada-Castillo, because the court failed to adequately justify its downward departures from the guidelines. The district court then resentenced the defendants, and they now appeal. 3 We affirm the sentences as to all three defendants. 4 * LEYVA A. Rule 32(c)(1) 1 5 Leyva contends that, contrary to…