Rafael Tadeo, Jr. Julieta Lambino Tadeo Roxanne Camille Tadeo Jennifer Ann Lambino Tadeo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
83 F.3d 429·1996 WL 207141·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28595
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 199694-70643California1,385 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 429 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rafael TADEO, Jr.; Julieta Lambino Tadeo; Roxanne Camille Tadeo; Jennifer Ann Lambino Tadeo, Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70643. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: THOMPSON, KLEINFELD and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rafael Tadeo, Jr., Julieta Lambino Tadeo, Roxanne Camille Tadeo, and Jennifer Ann Lambino Tadeo petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the Immigration Judge's (IJ) denial of their applications for asylum and withholding of deportation. The Tadeos have also moved to hold these appellate proceedings in abeyance pending the BIA's consideration of the Tadeos' motion to reopen, filed after the filing of their petition for review with this court. We have jurisdiction under section 106(a) of the Immigration and Naturalization Act,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.