Victor Rodolfo Toquero v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
83 F.3d 429·1996 WL 204559·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28596
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 26, 199694-70506California413 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 429 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Victor Rodolfo TOQUERO, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70506. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Victor Rodolfo Toquero, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' decision affirming the Immigration Judge's finding that he is statutorily ineligible for a Section 212(c) waiver of excludability and voluntary departure because he lacked good moral character during the seven years preceding the date of his application. The Immigration Judge found that Toquero gave false testimony under oath before a naturalization examiner for purposes of obtaining a visa. 1 3 On appeal to this court, Toquero concedes he is ineligible for Section 212(c) relief and instead contends that the Board…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.