Van Ordstrand v. Abelman

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert E. VAN ORDSTRAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Daniel ABELMAN; Gerald S. Bartfield; Belmont Equities, Inc., John Randall Hayes, John Does I through XXIX, and Roe Corporations I through XX, Defendants-Appellees, and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Jefferson Bank and Trust, Defendant-Intervenor. No. 95-15085. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996. Decided April 25, 1996. Before: HUG, Chief Judge, D.W. NELSON and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Robert E. Van Ordstrand appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment and judgment as a matter of law in favor of Daniel Abelman, Gerald S. Bartfield, John Hayes, and Belmont Equities, Inc., in Van Ordstrand's action arising from his elimination from a limited partnership organized to purchase and develop residential and commercial real property in Las Vegas, Nevada. We affirm. 3 1. When…