Wolfe v. Chater

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Burton H. WOLFE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration ** ; Pete Wilson; Thomas P. Nagle, Director, California Employment; Gray Davis, Chairman, California Franchise Tax Board, in their official capacities; State of California, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15833. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Burton H. Wolfe appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action challenging: 1) the State of California's reduction in state supplements to the monthly federal Supplemental Security Income benefits ("SSI"); and (2) the Social Security Commissioner's refusal to waive Wolfe's SSI overpayment. Wolfe also appeals the district court order denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.…