United States v. Offiong Eniang Offiong, Patricia Archey A/K/A Pat Archey

Good Law
83 F.3d 430·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28649
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 23, 199695-50179California2,840 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Offiong Eniang OFFIONG, Patricia Archey a/k/a Pat Archey, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 95-50179, 95-50247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 7, 1996. Decided April 23, 1996. Before: CANBY, BOOCHEVER, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Offiong Eniang Offiong appeals his convictions and sentence for conspiracy in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 and possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(3). Pat Archey, a co-defendant and co-conspirator, appeals her convictions for conspiracy, possession of fifteen or more unauthorized access devices, and wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm Archey's and Offiong's convictions. We vacate Offiong's sentence and remand for resentencing because the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.