United States v. Oliver Omenwu

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver OMENWU, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-55120. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Federal prisoner Oliver Omenwu appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his guilty plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute over 100 grams of heroin, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) and conspiracy, 21 U.S.C. § 846 . He contends that: (1) his counsel was ineffective because he was laboring under a conflict of interest which adversely affected his performance and (2) the district court erred by failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on the matter. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . We review de novo, Sanchez v. United States, 50 F.3d 1448, 1451-52 (9th Cir.1995), and we…