Araya Wolde-Giorgis, Dr. v. Arizona Department of Transportation State of Arizona

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Araya WOLDE-GIORGIS, Dr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; State of Arizona, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15503. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 22, 1996. * Decided April 26, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Dr. Araya Wolde-Giorgis appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 , 1983, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 ("ADEA") and 42 U.S.C. § 2000a et seq. ("Title VII"), for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Noll v. Carlson, 809 F.2d 1446, 1447 (9th Cir.1987), and we affirm in part, and vacate and remand, in part. 3 We agree with the district court's dismissal of the Arizona Department of Transportation ("ADOT") and the State of Arizona on the basis that the Eleventh Amendment bars these claims. See…