United States v. Richard Merrick Scott, United States of America v. Michael William Meehl, United States of America v. James Edward Lewus

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Merrick SCOTT, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael William MEEHL, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James Edward LEWUS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-10173, 95-10178, 95-10196. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 9, 1996. * Decided April 30, 1996. 1 Before: BROWNING and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE ** , Senior United States District Judge. 2 ORDER *** 3 The defendants entered into a plea agreement admitting jurisdictional facts and waiving "any right to raise or collaterally attack any matters pertaining to this prosecution and sentence if the sentence imposed is consistent with the terms of this agreement." Consequently, they cannot challenge directly or collaterally the jurisdiction of the district court. United States v. Mathews, 833 F.2d 161,…