United States v. Jose Luis Perez-Perez

Good Law
83 F.3d 430·1996 WL 183546·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 28654
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 12, 199695-30292California503 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 430 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Luis PEREZ-PEREZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30292. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 10, 1996. * Decided April 12, 1996. Before: HALL, THOMPSON, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Jose Luis Perez-Perez appeals his 18-month sentence following a guilty plea to distributing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Perez-Perez received a two-level minor role downward adjustment in his offense level under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(b). He contends that the district court erred by failing to give him a four-level adjustment for being a minimal participant under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(a), and for failing to give him a downward departure. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742 (a), 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 We review for clear error the district court's determination regarding a defendant's minor or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.