In Re MacFarlane

Good Law
83 F.3d 1041·35 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 1272·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11185·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3363
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 13, 199694-56064California2,514 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 1041 64 USLW 2726 , 35 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1272 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 77,002 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3363 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5487 In re Stephen MACFARLANE, Debtor. FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Creditor-Appellant-Cross-Appellee, v. Stephen MACFARLANE, Debtor-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Nos. 94-56064, 94-56065. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 6, 1996. Decided May 13, 1996. Anthony Sgherzi, Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, California, for appellant-cross-appellee Franchise Tax Board of the State of California. Elmer Dean Martin III, Diamond Bar, California, for appellee cross-appellant debtor Stephen B. Macfarlane. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California; John S. Rhoades, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-93-01435-JSR. Before: SKOPIL, Senior Circuit Judge, CANBY, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. SKOPIL, Senior Circuit Judge: 1 We address in these appeals which party has the ultimate burden of proof in bankruptcy proceedings when a state files a claim for taxes alleging that a debtor's bad debt deductions are invalid. Both the bankruptcy and district courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.