Marbled Murrelet v. Babbitt

Good Law
83 F.3d 1068·96 Daily Journal DAR 5295·26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20992·42 ERC (BNA) 1667·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 10420
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 7, 199695-16945California3,631 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 1068 42 ERC 1667 , 26 Envtl. L. Rep. 20 ,992, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3208 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 5295 MARBLED MURRELET, (Brachyramphus marmoratus); Northern Spotted Owl, (Strix occidentalis caurina); Environmental Protection Information Center, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Bruce BABBITT, Secretary, U.S. Department of Interior; Mollie Beattie, Director, United States Fish and Wildlife Service; Michael Spear, Director, Region 1, United States Fish & Wildlife Service; United States Fish & Wildlife Service, Defendants, and Pacific Lumber Company, a Delaware Corporation; Scotia Pacific Holding Company, a Delaware Corporation; Salmon Creek Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants-Appellants. No. 95-16945. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 14, 1996. Decided May 7, 1996. Jared G. Carter, Behnke & Oglesby, Ukiah, California and David S. Winton, Pillsbury Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellants. Thomas N. Lippe, San Francisco, California, for plaintiffs-appellees. James C. Kilbourne and Edward J. Shawaker, Appellate Section, United States Department of Justice, Washington D.C., for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.