Does 1 v. Chandler

Good Law
83 F.3d 1150·96 Daily Journal DAR 5653·5 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 849·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11421·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3466
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 17, 199695-17245California3,562 words

Opinion

Opinion

83 F.3d 1150 64 USLW 2735 , 5 A.D. Cases 849 , 15 A.D.D. 640, 8 NDLR P 78 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3466 John DOES 1-5, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; Jane Doe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Susan M. CHANDLER, Ph.D., Director of the Department of Human Services, a duly organized and recognized agency of the State of Hawaii; Patricia Murakami, Acting Administrator, Family & Adult Services Division, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-17245. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996. Decided May 17, 1996. 1 Stanley E. Levin, Honolulu, Hawaii and Michael K. Livingston, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants. 2 G. Cher Foerster, Office of the Attorney General, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii; Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV 95-498-HG. 4 Before BROWNING and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MERHIGE, Senior District Judge. * MERHIGE, Senior District Judge: 5 This case arises out of a class action lawsuit brought by Appellants, John Does 1-5 and Jane Doe,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.