Mchenry v. Renne

Good Law
84 F.3d 1172·96 Daily Journal DAR 6102·34 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1555·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 11924·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3749
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 28, 199694-15179California4,447 words

Opinion

Opinion

84 F.3d 1172 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1555 , 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3749 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6102 Keith McHENRY; Eric Warren, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Louise RENNE; John Willett; Charles Gallman; Frank Reed; Mary Burns; Timothy Hettrich; (Fnu) Blackwell; Edward Garcia; Mark Hernandez; Robert Battaglia; Robert J. Brodnik; S. Quadrelli; R. Farris, # 12212; John Does 1-10; Dirk Beijen; Richard Hongisto; Russell Matli # 1751 and the City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15179. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1995. Decided May 28, 1996. Randy Baker, Berkeley, California, for plaintiffs-appellants. Margaret W. Baumgartner, Deputy City Attorney, San Francisco, California, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Vaughn R. Walker, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-92-01154-VRW. Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: 1 The district judge dismissed plaintiffs' complaint under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 12, and 41 because it did not contain a short and plain statement of their claims for relief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.