Fort Belknap Indian Community v. State Of Montana

Good Law
84 F.3d 1222·96 Daily Journal DAR 6607·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13482·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4075
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 7, 199694-35126California183 words

Opinion

Opinion

84 F.3d 1222 The FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY OF the FORT BELKNAP INDIAN RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF MONTANA, Robert L. Robinson, individually and as Administrator, Gambling Control Division, Department of Justice, State of Montana; Stan Stephens, individually and as Governor, State of Montana; Marc Racicot, individually and as Attorney General, State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35126. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 7, 1996. 1 James L. Vogel, Hardin, Montana, for plaintiff-appellant. 2 Joseph P. Mazurek, Attorney General, and Deanne L. Sandholm, Assistant Attorney General, Helena, Montana, for defendants-appellees. 3 On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. 4 Before: BEEZER and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, Senior District Judge. * ORDER 5 The judgment of this court, 39 F.3d 1186 (Table), is vacated. For the reasons stated by the Supreme Court in Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 1114 , 134 L.Ed.2d 252 (1996), we affirm the judgment of the district court. 6 AFFIRMED. * The Honorable William H. Orrick, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.