96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4026, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6499 United States of America v. Jeremy Baird Gary Flores Jason Jordan Aaron Phillips Timothy Reasons

Good Law
85 F.3d 450
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 199694-10494California2,616 words

Opinion

Opinion

85 F.3d 450 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4026 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6499 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeremy BAIRD; Gary Flores; Jason Jordan; Aaron Phillips; Timothy Reasons, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-10494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 12, 1995. Decided June 5, 1996. Quin Denvir, Sacramento, California, for defendants-appellees. Charles J. Stevens, United States Attorney, Sacramento, California, for plaintiff-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-94-00162-WBS. Before GOODWIN, FARRIS and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge: 1 The question in this case is whether the presence of electronic video games turns a convenience store into a "public accommodation" under the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 42 U.S.C. § 2000a(b)(3). We conclude that it does. FACTS 2 Several alleged white supremacists were indicted for beating two men, one black and one Hispanic, in the parking lot of a 7-11 store. The indictment was federal, for conspiracy to violate civil rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241 , and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.