Astolfo v. Adventist Health Care West

Good Law
85 F.3d 634·1996 WL 228573·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31697
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 199695-16172California296 words

Opinion

Opinion

85 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Maria ASTOLFO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ADVENTIST HEALTH CARE WEST, a California Corporation; Castle Medical Center, a Hawaii Non-Profit Corporation; Adele Hoe; Cindy Kilbey; Gwen Brownfield, Gail Gindro; Mara Newton; Leroy Sauder; Terry White; Becky Goodhind, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-16172. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Maria Astolfo appeals pro se the district court's order confirming an arbitration award and granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer, Castle Medical Systems, and related entities and individuals, in her action alleging that she was wrongfully terminated and discriminated against in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.