Prime Aragon Arturo Santos Mamerto Caliva Manolito Mendavia v. Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital Gordon Cummings

Good Law
85 F.3d 634·1996 WL 256586·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31694
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 15, 199694-56619California2,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

85 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Prime ARAGON; Arturo Santos; Mamerto Caliva; Manolito Mendavia, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. HOLLYWOOD PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL; Gordon Cummings, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56619. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 9, 1996. * Decided May 15, 1996. Before: GIBSON, ** NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 * BACKGROUND 3 The plaintiffs, Prime Aragon, Arturo Santos, Mamerto Caliva, and Manolito Mendavia, are Filipinos who were discharged from discharges, the plaintiffs filed a complaint in state court against Queen of Angels and Gordon Cummings, a supervisor. The defendants successfully removed the case to federal court. 4 The first cause of action in the complaint alleges wrongful discharge in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq., and the California Constitution. The plaintiffs claim they were wrongfully discharged on the basis of their national origin.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.