Rizalina Abellan v. Fairmont Hotel

85 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Rizalina ABELLAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FAIRMONT HOTEL, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-16368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Rizalina Abellan appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of the Fairmont Hotel in her employment discrimination action alleging, among other claims, that the Fairmont violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5, by failing to promote her from pantry person to "Garde Manger," a semi-supervisory position, due to her gender. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 We are unable to discern from appellant's opening brief what issues she wishes to raise on appeal. Nevertheless, we have reviewed the record de novo, and we conclude that it fully supports the grant of summary judgment…