Christopher v. City of Chula Vista

85 F.3d 634 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lyman CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation; Cora Benitez; Gina Chammas; Cheryl Crutcher; Sandy Kissell; John Goss; Sandi Somervell; Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56459. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 11, 1996. Decided May 6, 1996. 1 Before: O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges; VAN SICKLE, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Lyman Christopher, former Director of Finance of the City of Chula Vista, appeals the district court's order partially dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California state law against the City of Chula Vista, the City Manager, and several female City employees alleging, among other claims, that the 4 proceedings. The charges were only investigated." Christopher v. City of Chula Vista, No. 94-0955, at 13 (S.D.Cal. Sept. 12, 1994). 5 On appeal, Christopher…