Todd Christopher Grange v. United States Parole Commission Wayne H. Seifert, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center at Los Angeles

85 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Todd Christopher GRANGE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION; Wayne H. Seifert, Warden of the Metropolitan Detention Center at Los Angeles, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-56401. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Todd Christopher Grange, a former federal prisoner, 1 appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. Grange contends that the United States Parole Commission ("Commission") violated his due process rights by disclosing to him insufficient evidence before his parole revocation hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's denial of a habeas corpus petition. Vargas v. United States Parole Comm'n, 865 F.2d 191, 193 (9th Cir.1988). When…