Dickinson v. Herman

Good Law
85 F.3d 635·1996 WL 32675·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31721
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJanuary 25, 199695-15679California1,389 words

Opinion

Opinion

85 F.3d 635 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kevin B. DICKINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. George HERMAN, Deputy Warden, Kaibab Prison Unit; Steve Matthews, CSO, Kaibab Prison; Guadelupe Hackenbracht, Sgt., Kaibab Prison; Sylvia Breakey, Medical Provider, Winslow Prison Compkex, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-15679. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Jan. 23, 1996. * Decided Jan. 25, 1996. Before: ALARCON, HALL, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kevin B. Dickinson appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging denial of due process in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, infringement of his free exercise of religion in violation of the First Amendment, and deliberate indifference to his medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand. 3 We review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.