Larue v. Blodgett

85 F.3d 636 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mark LARUE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James BLODGETT, Associate Director; Tana Wood, Superintendent; John Lambert, Associate Superintendent; Gary Edwards, Hearing Officer; R. Inman, Officer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-35936. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Washington state prisoner Mark Larue appeals pro se the district court Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. Larue contends that prison officials denied him due process protection by providing insufficient notice of his rules violation. He also contends that he was denied access to the courts because prison officials prohibited him from communicating with other inmates regarding his legal matters. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we review de novo.…