Rodriguez v. County of Alameda

Good Law
85 F.3d 637·1996 WL 228595·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 31744
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 6, 199695-17267California904 words

Opinion

Opinion

85 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alvaro RODRIGUEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF ALAMEDA; California Department of Highway Patrol; George C. Hernandez, individually and in his capacity as Judge of Alameda County; George Wood, individually and in his capacity as a Deputy District Attorney of Alameda County; Don L. Jones, individually and in his capacity as a C.H.P. officer of the Department of California Highway Patrol; Steven Ingram, individually and in his capacity as C.H.P. officer of the California Highway Patrol; Debra Wald, individually and in her capacity as a Public Defender of Alameda County; Catherine Lundy, individually and in her capacity as a Public Defender of Alameda County; Carol Lowman, individually and in her capacity as a Court Reporter of Alameda County; Michael D. O'Reilly, individually and in his capacity as a Deputy Attorney General of the State of California; Jesse J. Garcia, individually and in his capacity as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.