Sue C. Monroe v. United States

85 F.3d 637 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Sue C. MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-36219. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 9, 1996. * Decided May 16, 1996. 1 Before: LAY, ** FERGUSON, and LEAVY Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Federal prisoner, Sue Monroe, appeals pro se the district court's denial of her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct her sentence on the grounds of: ineffective assistance of counsel, abuse of judicial discretion, governmental interference with trial preparation, and the existence of new evidence. We review the denial of a petition for habeas corpus de novo. Calderon v. Prunty, 59 F.3d 1005, 1008 (9th Cir.1995). 4 Monroe was convicted in 1992 for multiple counts of bank fraud, possessing and uttering counterfeited checks, and money laundering. The district court sentenced Monroe to 168 months imprisonment, five years supervised…