United States v. Richard Aurelio Pina, United States of America v. David Luna

85 F.3d 638 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Aurelio PINA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David LUNA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-10148, 95-10149. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Feb. 12, 1996. * Decided May 7, 1996. 1 Before: CANBY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, and COLLINS, District Judge. ** 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Appellants Richard Aurelio Pina and David Luna, as well as a co-defendant who has not appealed, were indicted for armed bank robbery in the Eastern District of California. 1 A jury returned a verdict of guilty as to each of the defendants. This Court remanded the action for a new trial after finding that the district court improperly admitted evidence of other bank robberies that the appellants had committed in the District of Oregon subsequent to the actions for which they were charged in the Eastern District of California. 4…