Emmet Robert Snow v. Allied-Signal, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

85 F.3d 638 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Emmet Robert SNOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-16015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Emmet Robert Snow appeals from the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant Allied-Signal, Inc. ("Allied-Signal") in his diversity suit. Snow contends that the district court erred in concluding that his action was time barred because Snow was not of "unsound mind" so as to toll the applicable statute of limitation under Arizona law. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse and remand. 3 We review a district court's summary judgment de novo. Warren v. City of Carlsbad, 58 F.3d 439, 441 (9th Cir.1995), cert. denied, 116 S.Ct. 1261 (1996). We must determine, viewing the evidence…