United States v. Javier Reigos Manera, Eliazar Reigos Manera, Ambrosio Pineda Duque

85 F.3d 638 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Reigos MANERA, Eliazar Reigos Manera, Ambrosio Pineda Duque, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 95-10063, 95-10071 and 95-10303. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 12, 1996. * Decided April 15, 1996. Before: CHOY, BEEZER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Consolidated before us are the appeals of three defendants convicted in a single jury trial: Javier Reigos Manera ("Javier"), Eliazar Reigos Manera ("Eliazar"), and Ambrosio Pineda Duque ("Ambrosio"). Appellants raise several challenges to their convictions and sentences. Eliazar contends the district court violated his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation by failing to exclude allegedly inculpatory statements by non-testifying co-defendants. He also contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine in violation…