United States v. Charles Wesley Arlt

85 F.3d 638 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Wesley ARLT, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-50487. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 7, 1996. Decided May 15, 1996. Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Charles Wesley Arlt appeals the district court's denial of his pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment. In this interlocutory appeal, he argues that allowing the present criminal prosecution to go forward would violate double jeopardy in light of prior seizures of his property. We reject his arguments and affirm the district court. I. 3 On June 12, 1991, the Government issued its first superseding indictment charging Arlt with conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 846 , aiding and abetting the manufacture of methamphetamine, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), conspiracy to launder money, 18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 ,…