Shelton L. Watson v. Volume Services, Inc. Canteen Corp Tw Recreational Services Thomas E. Hagins, Does 1-10, Inclusive

85 F.3d 639 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Shelton L. WATSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLUME SERVICES, INC.; Canteen Corp; TW Recreational Services; Thomas E. Hagins, Does 1-10, Inclusive, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Dec. 6, 1995. * Decided Dec. 11, 1995. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Jan. 26, 1996. Before: PREGERSON, BRUNETTI, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Shelton Watson brought an action under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), claiming employment discrimination on the basis of race, physical handicap, and age. The district court granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment and Watson appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (a)(1), and we affirm. 3 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir.1994). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…