United States v. Cheryl Putra, Dimitri Kontopides, Dimitrios Liaskos, Vassilios Liaskos

85 F.3d 639 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Cheryl PUTRA, Dimitri Kontopides, Dimitrios Liaskos, * Vassilios Liaskos, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 94-10040, 94-10088, 94-10135 and 94-10136. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 14, 1996. Decided March 5, 1996. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Four codefendants convicted of various criminal violations resulting from their involvement in a lucrative narcotics operation in Hawaii appeal their convictions and sentences. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm the convictions and sentences, with the exception of Putra's sentence, which we deal with in a separate opinion remanding for resentencing. I. 3 Defendant Cheryl Ann Putra contends that insufficient evidence existed to support her conviction for aiding and abetting by knowingly and intentionally…