United States v. Pamela Ridley

85 F.3d 639 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pamela RIDLEY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-30368. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Pamela Ridley appeals her conviction by guilty plea to using or carrying a firearm during a drug trafficking crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Ridley contends that her conviction for using or carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime under § 924(c)(1) must be reversed in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Bailey v. United States, 116 S.Ct. 501 (1995). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we reverse and remand. 3 Ridley was charged with "using" or "carrying" of a firearm under § 924(c)(1). The government concedes that Ridley may not have "used" the firearm in relation…