John Donald Womack v. Clarence W. Dupnik Ray Ford Pima County

85 F.3d 639 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John Donald WOMACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Clarence W. DUPNIK; Ray Ford; Pima County, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-15051. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted April 30, 1996. * Decided May 6, 1996. Before: BROWNING, REINHARDT and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arizona state prisoner John Donald Womack appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of Pima County, Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik, and Pima County Detective Ray Ford, in Womack's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights by impounding his bus in connection with his arrest and refusing to return the bus and items inside of it. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We vacate and remand so that the district court can advise Womack of Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 requirements in order to effectively respond to defendants' motion for summary…