Compassion In Dying v. State Of Washington

Good Law
85 F.3d 1440·1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 14170·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4162
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 12, 199694-35534California7,472 words

Opinion

Opinion

85 F.3d 1440 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4162 COMPASSION IN DYING, a Washington nonprofit corporation; Jane Roe; John Doe; James Poe; Harold Glucksberg, M.D., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; Christine Gregoire, Attorney General of Washington, Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-35534. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 12, 1996. Before: HUG, Jr., Chief Judge, BROWNING, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, PREGERSON, REINHARDT, BEEZER, WIGGINS, THOMPSON, FERNANDEZ, KLEINFELD, O'SCANNLAIN and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 Prior report: 79 F.3d 790 . AMENDED ORDER 2 An active judge sua sponte requested that the full court rehear this case en banc. The request failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges. The request is rejected. 3 O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge, joined by TROTT and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges, dissenting from order rejecting request for rehearing en banc by the full court: 4 By promulgating a new constitutional right, one unheard of in over two hundred years of American history, six men and two women--endowed with life tenure and cloaked in the robes of this court--have enacted by judicial fiat what the people of the State of Washington…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.