96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4136, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6705 United States of America v. Dianne Marie August, United States of America v. Daniel Valentino Badaracco

86 F.3d 151 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4136 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6705 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dianne Marie AUGUST, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Valentino BADARACCO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 95-30220, 95-30224. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1996. Decided June 11, 1996. 1 Kenneth Ricardo Perry, Portland, Oregon, for defendant-appellant Dianne Marie August. 2 Ellen C. Pitcher, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Portland, Oregon, for defendant-appellant Daniel V. Badaracco. 3 Johnathan S. Haub, Assistant United States Attorney, Portland, Oregon, for plaintiff-appellee United States of America. 4 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Malcolm F. Marsh, District Judge, Presiding. 5 Before: GOODWIN and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges, and ARMSTRONG, * District Judge. ARMSTRONG, District Judge: 6 Dianne Marie August and Daniel V. Badaracco appeal their sentences of imprisonment, arguing that the district court miscalculated their guideline range under the United States Sentencing Guidelines ("U.S.S.G.") by improperly multiplying the estimated…