Singh

Singh v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Good Law
23 F. App'x 689
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 14, 2001No. 00-71533; INS No. A72-132-044California261 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Jasdev Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158 (a) and 1253(h). Because the transitional rules apply, see Kalaw v. INS, 133 F.3d 1147, 1150 (9th Cir.1997), we have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). We deny the petition.

Because the BIA independently reviewed the IJ’s decision, we review for substantial evidence the BIA’s adverse credibility finding. Cordon-Garcia v. INS, 204 F.3d 985, 990 (9th Cir.2000).

The BIA gave cogent reasons for questioning Singh’s credibility, see Lopez-Reyes v. INS, 79 F.3d 908, 911 (9th Cir.1996), and the discrepancies about Singh’s two arrests involved the heart of Singh’s asylum claim, see Pal v. INS, 204 F.3d 935, 938 (9th Cir.2000). Substantial evidence supports the adverse credibility finding of the BIA, see Berroteran-Melendez v. INS, 955 F.2d 1251, 1257 (9th Cir.1992), and the record does not compel us to find otherwise, see Pal, 204 F.3d at 938 . Accordingly, Singh failed to satisfy the subjective component…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.