Boy Scouts Of America v. Graham

Good Law
86 F.3d 861
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 13, 199694-16609California4,651 words

Opinion

Opinion

86 F.3d 861 34 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1137 , 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6848 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA; Mount Diablo Silverado Council; M/V St. Ambrose; Explorer/Sea Scout Post 248, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Patrick Sean GRAHAM, Claimant-Appellant, and William Brazil, Claimant. No. 94-16609. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 4, 1995. Decided Feb. 15, 1996. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc June 13, 1996. * 1 David J. McMahon, Barger & Wolen, San Francisco, California, for plaintiffs-appellees. 2 Joseph W. Klobas, Law Office of Joseph W. Klobas, Santa Barbara, California, for claimant-appellant. 3 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Marilyn H. Patel, District Judge, Presiding. 4 Before: GOODWIN and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. ** SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge: 5 Patrick Graham ("Graham") appealed from the summary judgment granted to the vessel owner and owner pro hac vice in their action for exoneration and limitation of liability. Graham was an adult volunteer and "mate" on an outing with the Sea Explorers, a nautical troop of boy scouts. Graham was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.